|
Published 10th Feb 2009 Posted by admin |
|
Great leadership is a key long-term success of the organization, so how is it that there seems to be a shortage of this kind? In the corridors of political power, and in the boardrooms of large and small organizations, who regularly hear the questions: “Where is the inspired leadership we crave?” “Where is our next generation of leaders coming from?” “Where is the style and inspiration they need to lead to the next level?” If you ask, you can probably say what ‘leadership’ is. Like everyone else, they read books and seen the leadership competency frameworks. You could clearly describe how it feels to be well led and bad – who knows that when you see it. “But how many great leaders of the world today can name at the top of your head? How many great leaders in their organization now? Why so many people, knowing what is good leadership, not to prove so? The first place to look is in the learning environment where leaders are usually developed. What they do not teach you about leadership 1. There is an imbalance in the training of leaders. Not enough emphasis on skills essential to good leadership, to inspire others with beliefs, vision, values and attitudes and too much emphasis on the importance of systems, planning, measurement, budgets, controls and procedures – in summary, management! Have you a great leader in the management of people behind him? No, he inspires them, motivates them in contact with the larger view – that leads them. 2. As a business leader, you have probably been well trained in logic and analysis. But a key factor of leadership is the ability of the implementation of the “emotional intelligence” – the ability to know when things are “real” or are “off” when people are really inspired, or merely paying lip service. As a leader you need emotional intelligence to manage their own and others’ emotions, and you need knowledge to this task. Trying to do it through analysis and logic is almost as effective as trying to drive a vehicle through the study of a manual of how the motor. 3. People, especially in the business world, tend to avoid the emotion – that is, dealing with it, seeing where it comes from and its role in a situation. The reason for failing to deal with emotion, the very essence of leadership is that all the emotion of this material “is” amateur “! Not so: it is only “slightly” to suppress or express emotions inappropriately. When all the emotion of this material is not to study and resolve in leadership groups, which always produces long-term tensions and political battles. These cause acute stress in humans and paralyze organizational effectiveness and efficiency. At the same time, destroy the satisfaction, joy, fun, friendship, health, confidence and a good night’s sleep! 4. Leadership skills such as vision, inspiration and emotional intelligence can be trained in training courses – but you need a different type of course. In most training programs in leadership, you will see the models of leadership discussed, followed by practical exercises to analyze what is obviously good and bad leadership in the game. ” It is well known and fun, but what is taught are the elements that sustain the leadership, not the essence of leadership. How can you learn to ‘do’ Great Leadership? You need to be trained in leadership skills, with time, in real situations – those that you care and that there is a significant chance of success or failure – by coaches, who in turn demonstrate the capability. A life such as leadership ability can not be learned by the numbers, you can not read a book about him, a model to learn or play a game that simulates a real situation, and say you know about leadership. The greater the “distance” is the learning experience of real-world experience, the less likely it is that learning is transferred to his life. You do not learn to drive by sitting in a classroom! Therefore, it can only be effectively demonstrate leadership skills when the situation for them is real. Get a coach who has the experience to produce leadership competence, and placed on an agenda that is guided through the experience in real time to learn leadership skills over time. Only such an approach eventually to the point that leadership is the competitive natural and instinctive as his driving ability! |
|
Published 10th Feb 2009 Posted by admin |
|
Much has been written about leadership: rules, pointers, styles, and biographies of inspiring leaders throughout world history. But there are certain leadership ideas that we ourselves not to recognize and realize in the course of reading books. Here is a brief list of things you thought you knew about leadership.
1. Leaders come in different flavors. There are different kinds of leaders and is likely to encounter more than a guy in your life. Formal leaders are those who choose to positions or offices such as senators, congressmen and presidents of local clubs. Informal leaders or those we look up under your wisdom and experience, as in the case of the elders of a tribe, or our grandparents, or by virtue of their experience and contribution in a field such as Albert Einstein in the field Theoretical Physics and Leonardo da Vinci in the field of arts. Both formal and informal leaders practice a combination of leadership styles. Lewin three basic styles of leadership: authority, participatory, and delegative Likert four leadership styles: authorized operation, authority benevolent, consultative and participatory Goleman six emotional leadership styles – visionary, coaching, affiliative, democratic, pacesetting, and commanding. 2. Leadership is a process of becoming. Although some people seem to have been born with innate qualities of leadership, without the right environment and exposure can not develop their full potential. Just as learning to ride a bike, you can also learn to become a leader and hone your leadership skills. Knowledge on leadership theories and skills may be formally gained by enrolling in leadership seminars, workshops and conferences. Daily interactions with people provide the opportunity to see theory and practice of leadership. Together, formal and informal learning will help you gain leadership attitudes, gain knowledge of leadership and thus promote the learning cycle. Is not to become a leader in one day and stopped. Lifelong learning is important in being a good leader for each day brings new experiences that put your knowledge, skills and attitude to a test. 3. Leadership begins with you. The best way to develop leadership skills applicable to their own lives. As adage goes “action speaks louder than words.” Leaders are always in the limelight. Keep in mind that your credibility as a leader depends much on your actions: your interaction with your family, friends and coworkers, the way they manage their personal and organizational responsibilities, and even how to talk with the newspaper seller entire street. Repeated actions become habits. Habits in turn form a person’s character. Steven Covey’s book entitled 7 Habits of Highly Effective People “has good ideas on how you can achieve personal leadership. 4. Leadership is shared. Leadership is not the sole responsibility of an individual but rather a shared responsibility among members of a new computer. A leader belongs to a group. Each member has responsibilities to fulfill. Formal leadership positions are merely added responsibilities aside from their responsibilities as team members. Effective leadership requires members to do their part. Starting as a mere group of individuals, members and leaders work towards the formation of an effective team. In this sense, social interaction plays an important role in leadership. To learn to work together requires a great deal of trust between leaders and members of a new computer. The trust is based on actions and not merely in words. When there is mutual respect, trust and building confidence is built. 5. Leadership styles depends on the situation. How is the dictatorship of works by Singapore, but not in the United States of America? Aside from culture, beliefs, values and form of government, the state of a nation also affects the leadership styles used by its formal leaders. There is no rule that only one style can be used. Most of the time, leaders employ a combination of leadership styles depending on the situation. In emergency situations such as periods of war and calamity, decision-making is a matter of life or death. Therefore, the leader of a nation can not afford to consult with all departments to reach crucial decisions. The case is of course different in times of peace and order — different sectors and other branches of government can freely interact and participate in governance. Another case in point is the leader in organizations. Where staff are highly motivated and competent, a combination of high and moderate delegative participative leadership style is most appropriate. But if the staff has little competition and low commitment, a combination of high, high support and senior management of the behavior of organizational leaders is required. Now that you remember these things, keep in mind that there are always ideas that we think we know the things that we take for granted, but in reality are most useful in leadership. |
|
Published 10th Feb 2009 Posted by admin |
|
Much is written about leadership, as books on leadership styles, techniques and also biographies of leaders that have inspired people to action. While this is true, it is the everyday leadership and a slightly different perspective of leadership as well. Here are some of them. 1. There are different kinds of leaders Among the leaders are the formal and informal leaders. Formal leaders are elected to their positions like congressmen, senators and officials of clubs. Informal leaders on the other hand are those who see it because of his experience and wisdom. This could be your parents, grandparents or older people in their community. Informal leaders can also be those that are respected for their expertise and contributions in some areas such as Albert Einstein in Theoretical Physics and Leonardo da Vinci Art. Whether formal or informal, these leaders practice certain styles. This could be a. Lewin 3 basic styles of leadership - Autocratic or authoritative: the leader makes decisions without consulting others - Democratic or participative: the leader involves people in decision making - Laissez-faire or delegative: the leader’s participation in decision making is minimized b. Likert 4 leadership styles - Operation allowed: the leader has little concern for people and the use of such methods as threats and other fear-based methods to achieve compliance - Benevolent authority, the utmost concern to leading people to a position of authority - Query: the leader makes genuine efforts to listen carefully to the ideas, but major decisions remain largely in the center was - Participation: the leader makes maximum use of participatory methods, involving people further down the organization in decision making c. Goleman 6 emotional leadership styles - Visionary leader inspires, believes in the vision, empathy, and explains how and why people’s efforts contribute to the “dream” - Coaching: the leader listens, helps people identify their own strengths and weaknesses, advises, encourages, and delegates - Affiliative: the leader promotes harmony, is nice, empathy, enhances morale, and resolve conflicts - Democrat: the leader is an excellent listener, team worker, collaborator, and the influence - Pacesetting: the leader has a strong drive to achieve, it has a high level, the initiative, but low on empathy and collaboration, impatient, and micromanages is driven by the numbers - The command is the commander, threatening, has a tight control, monitors studiously, creates dissonance, contaminates everyone’s mood, and drives away talent 2. Leadership skills can be developed For some, the leadership seems to be more natural, which makes it questionable whether one is born with that quality. Even if this may be true, without exposure to an environment, it may not develop their full potential. You can learn to become a leader. Attend leadership training and management seminars. Read books on leadership. You can see the leadership skills in their daily interaction, not only in the working environment, but even in the home and social environment. This becomes evident when something goes wrong and you see how the person responds and sets things right. Observing both formal and informal leadership modes, you can pick up new ideas and leadership of their knowledge of leadership skills. Remember, however, that leadership styles do not learn in a day. Daily use is necessary to learn from experience and to put their knowledge and skills to the test. 3. Practice makes perfect Knowledge alone is not enough to develop leadership styles. The best way to develop is applicable at every opportunity you get. As has been improved, people recognize that when you take care about. Leadership is not just handling situations. It is also how to carry yourself. How to relate to people, like your job, family, friends or the type of library. It is also reflected in how well they manage their personal and organizational responsibilities. If the application of their knowledge, leadership should become a habit for you. 4. Successful leadership requires trust between the leader and team There is no leader without the team members. The responsibility for achieving the goals is a shared responsibility as the leader alone can not achieve. A person can be a leader as an official position, but this does not necessarily mean he or she can bring the team to complete the tasks at hand. Each member has his own abilities that makes them informal leaders in those areas. The formal leader must be able to work together with the team and give confidence to create a cohesive group. Just words are not enough. Appropriate action will be needed to build confidence and foster trust. 5. Situational Leadership The kind of leadership varies depending on the situation at hand. You can apply not only the last technique he learned without due consideration to the situation. In emergency situations, like a fire, you will not be available to all in the decision. It is different in normal times, especially when all you need to buy. In this case, you need to have a consultative approach. The style you choose will also depend on the skill level of your computer. For a skilled and motivated team, you can use a combination of high and moderate participative styles delegative. But if the team has low competence, you may need to use a combination of high, high and very supportive of the direction of leadership styles. Leadership styles must be continually learned not only through leadership training and books but also from observing other good leaders. Most importantly, practice because the best learning is what they learn from their own experience. |
|
Published 10th Feb 2009 Posted by admin |
|
The big rumor in Learning and Community Development is about development of leadership. “If only we could be good leaders,” goes the argument, “that could beat the world”
This belief is so entrenched that almost no one stops to it. But when you step back for a second, a large number of questions. For example: 1. If leaders need training, Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin? We all know that good leaders. We knew when we were in the playground, and when it sees a prank, we followed. Probably our first attempt of illegal cigarettes at the behest of a leader of our children and with an interest in their offerings too. Therefore, it is clear that leadership qualities are not only evident from a young age, but are an important part of our development. So why do we think we have to train leaders? For several reasons. First, although the leadership may be an innate talent, like all natural gifts, if not channeled properly, bad habits and develop flowering potential may be unrealized. Secondly, there is more that there is need for leadership candidates. The leaders of games can go to the military or high-flyers in the world of big business, but is not likely to end up running a small unit of social services in a manner outside the provincial town. Finally, leaders must be part of a team, and for the team to function efficiently, leading to the need to know the basic rules so that they can serve effectively. Therefore, having concluded that leadership training is both necessary and desirable, how is it organized? The jumping point for any training course is, and must be, formal instruction in the theory and principles of leadership. There are only three ways to do this. 1. Books. There are literally hundreds of texts on leadership. Most business schools also offer free podcasts and webinars. Students eager to absorb any number of treaties on various systems and processes of leadership, but be cautious. Some of the best writing is outdated and does not comply with modern ideas of management. Many academic units are useful, but on the basis of case studies at the peak of the experience of leadership and thus separated from reality. While books are an essential resource, are satisfactory only as a reference and as part of the study focused more. 2. Courses. It may not have as many courses as there are books, but it feels that way. Regardless of their discipline, geography academic or industry professional, will lead a course bespoke to their needs and packaged to meet your needs. Although many of these courses are tailored to their industry by an experienced professional in the end, the leadership of the system, process or methodology is taught as much a matter of personal preference of the coach, since it is a reflection of best practices. In fact there are hundreds of models of leadership. All are based on observation and research and will have some applicability, but there is no “right” or “evil” system. A course is not to emphasize a particular approach and provide a basis for coherence among those attending. 3. Practical experience. The sure fire way to develop leadership skills is practice. If, under the direction of the leader, the result is “success”, then he or she needs to capture the behavior that led to that success. And if it fails, then the behavior must be modified and tried again. With coaching and mentoring are so effective. But, of course, the experience can be very convenient, it can also be costly and risky. So how can organizations that want to instill leadership qualities provide an opportunity to practice in a safe environment that allows emerging leaders to make mistakes and learn from them? Although I was tired of hearing that customers of its business is “different”, the truth is that no company is identical to any other. Just as each person is an individual, so each organization reflected in the individual in terms of history, culture, systems, processes and resources. May have common features that can make a line in a leader, but there are no absolute answers. Organizations need to develop training schemes to suit their own purposes. Regardless of how this is achieved, the point is almost always a process, the model or the philosophy that expresses the culture of “how to” leadership “is here.” Although there is no doubt that the courses have a formal role to play in defining a common understanding and approach to leadership, in the final analysis, the element of practical development of leadership skills should be an internal process. Although not necessarily recognized or universally accepted, many approaches to leadership are based on a model of six stages: 1. History: How did we get where we are? This model suggests that to succeed, the leader has to ask six basic questions: A. Where do we want? Following this approach, the leadership structure of your team can deploy its resources and provide support, guidance and information to get the team there. Although the model itself is quite simple, its assembly in a course is a bit more problematic. The content is simple, clear and easily understandable. With a high level, a coach usually can be obtained from the theory in an easy morning. The issue is with the practice sessions. Most courses have between ten and fifteen delegates from six or seven, although it is not uncommon. To practice effective leadership, the team should consist of at least four members. So, with all delegates the opportunity to get the lead and the assumption that multiple computers can play in parallel, this is a day especially when the quality that permits feedback and consolidation. To provide practical experience, using tools such as Super Tanker, Westrek, Viking Attack! and Terra Nova. These are separate packages that contain everything needed to run a session. For more “flavor” of the activities you can perform a competition between the groups with a prize for the winning team. This puts additional pressure on the leader and can be a useful device to create tension in the equipment. The following structure is very tight, but by limiting the practice sessions of 45 minutes with 15 minutes for comments, you can get 16 delegates in the program through a (very full) day. Ideally, of course, extending over two days and allow more time for exercises and feedback. This would also allow more time for consolidation and planning for action after the delegates return to the workplace. Time (min) – Track An alternative could be to structure the sessions to break into the software and run a series of 2-3 hours of classes for three or four weeks. For a successful session is important that the leadership of the lessons are aligned with organizational needs and that delegates leave the course with a clear action plan to improve its own performance. The importance of the meetings can not be overstated. A non-disclosure agreement must be obtained from all participants and supporters to comment on how the leader they felt during the exercise. This can be a brutal lesson, but it is vital that delegates will get the full value of the session. In short, every company needs leaders at all levels throughout the organization. With a little careful planning, clear learning outcomes and the right tools, virtually anyone can build a very successful program that will have dramatic and lasting results. |
